Nonetheless, it remains accessible to how audience means so it performs, which is the essence away from emptiness
Scientific research, try actions, results and you may perceptions is invented regarding head, including creativity and you can term and build programming. The right revealing away from abilities is even crucial. Particularly in theoretical physics, linguistic skill and carefulness while you are writing get a very clicking you would like within the the latest subjects during the horizons out-of existing degree. You can find folks from other sphere that prepared to get me wrong and you may spark way too many discourses/conclusions; it establish instructions away from a few bytes of information for example «yes/no/maybe»; consequently, nonscience otherwise occult misinformation is provided, samples of and that are plentiful from the areas from unique relativity theory and you can quantum physics. Hence, technology should not use the phrases you to offered the fresh new Paleolithic brain. Category: Standard Technology and Opinions
Trappist-1 Superstar Program
The brand new James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) will quickly transcend just what Hubble could have been able to mention. Certainly one of their basic plans should be the new TRAPPIST-step one star program from inside the Aquarius. So it article examines as to why one puny red dwarf is so interesting, and why the latest search for alien life forms age. Category: General Science and you may Philosophy
Physical dimensions like «mass», «length», «charge», represented by the symbols $[M], [L], [Q]$, are <\it>, but used as <\it>to perform dimensional analysis in particular, and to write the equations of physics in general, by the physicist. The law of excluded middle falls short of explaining the contradictory meanings of the same symbols. The statements like «$m\to 0$», «$r\to 0$», «$q\to 0$», used by the physicist, are inconsistent on dimensional grounds because «$ m$», «$r$», «$q$» represent <\it>with physical dimensions of $[M], [L], [Q]$ respectively and «$0$» represents just a number — devoid of physical dimension. Consequently, the involvement of the statement «$\lim_$, where $q$ is the test charge» in the definition of electric field, leads to either circular reasoning or a contradiction regarding the experimental verification of the smallest charge in the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. Considering such issues as problematic, by choice, I make an inquiry regarding the basic language in terms of which physics is written, with an aim of exploring how truthfully the verbal statements can be converted to the corresponding physico-mathematical expressions, where «physico-mathematical» signifies the involvement of physical dimensions. Such investigation necessitates an explanation by demonstration of «self inquiry», «middle way», «dependent origination», «emptiness/relational existence», which are certain terms that signify the basic tenets of Buddhism. In light of such demonstration I explain my view of «definition»; the relations among quantity, physical dimension and number; meaninglessness of «zero quantity» and the associated logico-linguistic fallacy; difference between unit and unity. Considering the importance of the notion of electric field in physics, I present a critical analysis of the definitions of electric field due to Maxwell and Jackson, along with the physico-mathematical conversions of the verbal statements. The analysis of Jackson’s definition points towards an expression of the electric field as an infinite series due to the associated «limiting process» of the test charge. However, it brings out the necessity of a postulate regarding the existence of charges, which nevertheless follows from the definition of quantity. Consequently, I explain the notion of <\it>that act as the middle way to resolve the contradiction regarding the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. In passing, I provide a logico-linguistic analysis, in physico-mathematical terms, of two verbal statements of Maxwell in relation to his definition of electric field, which suggests Maxwell’s conception of dependent origination of distance and charge (i.e. $[L]\equiv[Q]$) and that of emptiness in the context of relative vacuum (in contrast to modern absolute vacuum). This work is an appeal for the dissociation of the categorical disciplines of logic and physics and on the large, a fruitful merger of Eastern philosophy and Western science. Category: General Science and Philosophy